Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add filters








Year range
1.
Braz. j. otorhinolaryngol. (Impr.) ; 79(1): 100-105, jan.-fev. 2013. tab
Article in Portuguese | LILACS | ID: lil-667983

ABSTRACT

São poucos os estudos que comparam resultados endoscópicos no paciente acordado com o mesmo paciente sob sono induzido por drogas. OBJETIVOS: O objetivo do presente estudo é comparar os acha dos endoscópicos num mesmo paciente, em dois momentos diferentes: ambulatorial e sob sedação com propofol, por meio da classificação de Fujita. Desenho do estudo: estudo de coorte transversal. MÉTODO: Trinta e quatro pacientes foram submetido ao exame otorrinolaringológico ambulatorial, incluindo nasoendoscopia com manobra de Müller com o paciente acordado e à sonoendoscopia com propofol. A classificação de Fujita foi adotada para comparar os dois exames endoscópicos. Correlacionamos a concordância entre os exames com dados clínicos dos pacientes, como Índice de Massa Corporal, idade e gravidade da síndrome da apneia obstrutiva do sono. RESULTADOS: Não houve concordância nenhuma entre os dois exames endoscópicos, seja para o grupo no geral, seja para cada um dos subgrupos analisados. CONCLUSÃO: Não existe concordância entre os achados endoscópicos com o paciente acordado e os mesmos com o paciente com sono induzido.


Only a few studies have compared the outcomes of patients kept awake during endoscopic examination and subjects submitted to drug-induced sleep endoscopy. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the endoscopic findings of patients submitted to outpatient endoscopy and endoscopic examination with sedation by propofol based on the Fujita Classification. METHOD: This cross-sectional cohort study enrolled 34 patients. The subjects underwent ENT examination, nasal endoscopy with Müller's maneuver, and drug-induced sleep endoscopy with propofol. The Fujita Classification was used to compare the two modes of endoscopic examination. The examinations were correlated to patient clinical data such as BMI, age, and OSAS severity. RESULTS: There was no agreement between the two modes of endoscopic examination, whether for the group in general or for the analyzed subgroups. CONCLUSION: There was no agreement between the endoscopic findings of endoscopic examinations done with the patient awake or in drug-induced sleep.


Subject(s)
Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Endoscopy/methods , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/diagnosis , Sleep/physiology , Wakefulness/physiology , Anesthetics, Intravenous/administration & dosage , Body Mass Index , Cohort Studies , Cross-Sectional Studies , Propofol/administration & dosage , Severity of Illness Index , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/physiopathology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL